Cho, S-J., Watson, D.G., Jacobs, C.L., & Naveiras, M. (in press). A markov mixed-effect multinomial logistic regression model for nominal repeated measures with an application to syntactic self-priming effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research.
Buxó-Lugo, A., Jacobs, C. L., & Watson, D.G. (2020). The world is not enough to explain lengthening of phonological competitors. Journal of Memory and Language.
Kimball, A.E., Yiu, L.K., & Watson, D.G. (2019) Word recall is affected by surrounding metrial context. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2019.1665190
Watson, D. G., Jacobs, C. L., Buxó-Lugo, A. (2019). Prosody indexes both competence and performance. WIREs Cognitive Science.
Jacobs, C. L., Loucks, T., Watson, D. G., & Dell, G. S. (2019). Masking auditory feedback does not eliminate repetition reduction. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience.
Myers, B.R. & Watson, D.G. (2019) Paying the meter: Effect of metrical similarity on word lengthening, Psychomic Bulletin & Review, doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01635-4.
Jacobs, C. L. , Cho, S-J, & Watson, D.G. (2019) Comprehension input leads to syntactic priming in production but speakers do not prime themselves, Cognitive Science, 43, doi: 10.1111/cogs.12749.
James, A.N., Fraundorf, S. H., Lee, E-K, & Watson, D.G.(2018) Individual differences in syntactic processing: Is there evidence for reader-text interactions? Journal of Memory and Language, 102, 155-181.
Harrington-Stack, C., James, A.,N., & Watson, D.G. (2018). A failure to replicate rapid syntactic adaptation in comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 102, 155-181. [pdf]
Tooley, K.M., Konopka, A.K., & Watson, D.G. (2018) Assessing priming for prosodic representations: Speaking rate, intonational phrase boundaries, and pitch accenting. Memory & Cognition, 46, 625-641.
Buxo-Lugo, A., Toscano, J., & Watson, D.G. (2016). Effects of participant engagement on prosodic prominence. Discourse Processes, 55, 305-323.
Buxo-Lugo, A. & Watson, D.G. (2016). Evidence for the influence of syntax on prosodic parsing. Journal of Memory and Language, 90, 1-13.
Jacobs, C.L, Yiu, L.K., Watson, D.G., & Dell, G.S. (2015) Why are repeated words produced with reduced durations? Evidence from inner speech and homophone production. Journal of Memory and Language, 84, 37-48.
Yiu, L.K. & Watson, D.G. (2015). When overlap leads to competition: Effects of phonological encoding on word duration. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 22, 1701-1708. [pdf]
Watson, D. G., Buxó-Lugo, A., & Simmons, D. C. (2015). The effect of phonological encoding on word duration: Selection takes time. In L. Frazier & E. Gibson (Eds.), Explicit and Implicit Prosody in Sentence Processing: Studies in Honor of Janet Dean Fodor. New York: Springer International. [pdf]
Toscano, J.C., Buxó-Lugo, A., & Watson, D.G. (2015). Using game-based approaches to increase level of engagement in research and education. In S. Dikkers (Ed.), TeacherCraft: Using Minecraft for Teaching and Learning. Pittsburgh: ETC Press. [pdf]
Arnold, J.E. & Watson, D.G. (2015). Synthesizing meaning and processing approaches to prosody: Performance matters. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 30, 88-102. [pdf]
Lewis, M.L. & Watson, D.G. (2015) Effects of lexical semantics on acoustic prominence. Language and Cognition, 7, 1-21. [pdf]
Fraundorf, S.H., Watson, D.G., & Benjamin, A.S. (2015). Reduction in prosodic prominence predicts speakers' recall: Implications for theories of prosody. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 30, 606-619. [pdf]
Fraundorf, S.M. & Watson, D.G. (2014). Alice’s adventures in Um-derland: Psycholinguistic dimensions of variation in disfluency production. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 29, 1083-1096. [pdf]
Tooley, K.M., Konopka, A.E., & Watson, D.G. (2014). Can intonational phrase structure be primed (like syntactic structure). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 40, 348-363. [pdf]
Gillespie, M., James, A.N., Federmeier, K.D., & Watson, D.G. (2014). Verbal working memory predicts co-speech gesture: Evidence from individual differences. Cognition, 132, 174-180. [pdf]
Lam, T. Q. & Watson, D.G. (2014) Repetition Reduction: Lexical repetition in the absence of referent repetition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 40, 829-843. [pdf]
Lee, E-K., Brown-Schmidt, S., & Watson, D.G. (2013). Ways of looking ahead: Incrementality in language production. Cognition, 129, 544-562. [pdf]
Fraundorf, S. H., Benjamin, A.S., & Watson, D.G. (2013). What happened (and what didn’t): Font emphasis promotes representation of salient alternatives in discourse. Journal of Memory and Language, 69, 196-227. [pdf]
Lee, E.-K., & Watson, D. G. (2012). Sentence processing. In V. S. Ramachandran (Editor-In-Chief), Encyclopedia of Human Behavior (2nd Edition). San Diego, CA: Elsevier. [pdf]
Watson, D. G. (2012). Prosody in Production. In H. Pashler (Ed.) Encyclopedia of Mind. Sage Publications. [pdf]
Fraundorf, S. H., Watson, D. G., & Benjamin, A. S. (2012). The effects of age on the strategic use of pitch accents in memory for discourse: A process-resource account. Psychology and Aging, 27, 88-98. [pdf]
Breen, M., Watson, D. G., & Gibson, E. (2011). Intonational phrasing is constrained by meaning, not balance. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26 (10), 1532-1562. [pdf]
Fraundorf, S. H., & Watson, D. G. (2011). The disfluent discourse: Effects of filled pauses on recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 161-175. [pdf]
Lee, E.-K. & Watson, D. G. (2011). Effects of pitch accents in attachment ambiguity resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26, 262-297. [pdf]
Fraundorf, S. H., Watson, D. G., & Benjamin, A. S. (2010). Recognition memory reveals just how CONTRASTIVE contrastive accenting really is. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 367-386. [pdf]
Isaacs, A. M. & Watson, D. G. (2010). Accent detection is a slippery slope: Direction and rate of F0 change drives comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 1178-1200.[pdf]
Lam, T. Q. & Watson, D. G. (2010). Repetition is easy: Why repeated referents have reduced prominence. Memory & Cognition, 38, 1137-1146. [pdf]
Wagner, M. & Watson, D. G. (2010). Experimental and theoretical advances in prosody: A review. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 905-945. [pdf]
Watson, D. G. (2010) The many roads to prominence: Understanding emphasis in conversation. In B. Ross (Ed.) The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 52 (163-183). Elsevier. [pdf]
Diehl, J. J., Watson, D. G., Bennetto, L., McDonough, J., Young, E. C., & Gunlogson, C. (2008). An acoustic analysis of prosody in high functioning autism. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, 1-20. [pdf]
Diehl, J., Bennetto, L., Watson, D., Gunlogson, C., & McDonough, J. (2008). Resolving ambiguity: A psycholinguistic approach to understanding prosody processing in high-functioning autism. Brain & Language, 106, 144-152. [pdf]
Wonnacott, E. & Watson, D. (2008). Acoustic emphasis in four year olds. Cognition, 107,1093-1101.[pdf]
Watson, D., Gunlogson, C., & Tanenhaus, M. (2008). Interpreting pitch accents in on-line comprehension: H* vs L+H*. Cognitive Science, 32, 1232-1244. [pdf | Sound Files]
Watson, D., Arnold, J.A., & Tanenhaus, M.K. (2008) Tic Tac TOE: Effects of predictability and importance on acoustic prominence in language production. Cognition, 106, 1548-1557.[pdf | corrigendum]
Watson, D., Breen, M., & Gibson, E.A. (2006) The role of syntactic obligatoriness in the production of intonational boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 32, 1045-1056. [pdf]
Watson, D.G., Gunlogson, C. A., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2006). Online methods for the investigation of prosody. In S. Sudhoff, D. Lenertov, R. Meyer, S. Pappert, P. Augurzky, I. Mleinek, N. Richter, J. Schlieer (eds.), Methods in Empirical Prosody Research. Walter de Gruyter: New York. 259-282. [pdf]
Gibson, E., Desmet, T., Grodner, D., Watson, D. & Ko, K., (2005) Reading relative clauses in English. Cognitive Linguistics, 16 ,315-353. [pdf]
Grodner, D. J., Gibson, E., & Watson, D. (2005) The influence of contextual contrast on syntactic processing: Evidence for strong-interaction in sentence comprehension. Cognition, 95, 275-296. [pdf]
Watson, D. & Gibson, E. (2005) Intonational Phrasing and Constituency in Language Production and Comprehension. Studia Linguistica, 59, 279-300. [pdf]
Watson, D. & Gibson, E. (2004) The relationship between intonational phrasing and syntactic structure in language production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 713-755. [pdf]
Watson, D. & Gibson, E. (2004) Making Sense of the Sense Unit Condition, Linguistic Inquiry, 35, 508-517. [pdf]